Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campus Front of India (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This discussion has had lower participation than is ideal, but after a full month, I think it's time to close this. Consider this a mildly "weak keep", but let's move forward. Ajpolino (talk) 04:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Campus Front of India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GROUP there seems to be no reliable indepth coverage of the organization itself. ChunnuBhai (talk) 10:38, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ChunnuBhai (talk) 10:38, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ChunnuBhai (talk) 10:38, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep But this should be noted that this is the student wing of Radical^[1] Islamist^[2], Popular Front Of India. They are educated but violent Assault on T. J. Joseph, and the PFI article was permanently protected due to vandalism and COI editing by PFI activists. I can guarantee that Campus Front of India members will regularly visit their organization page and try to remove negative sourced content. Their SDPI page has fewer visitors. See Death of Abhimanyu. Knight Skywalker (talk) 04:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even currently the first line is written by using websites that have a bias in favor of them. Knight Skywalker (talk) 13:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The article has multiple links to Hindustan Times, Times of India, Deccan Herald and other RS that provide substantial coverage. Passes GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The page creator is COI editor. Currently inactive. Tenpointer1 uploaded an image of boys claiming to be CFI members. The article's contents made with primary sources, unreliable websites should be removed. Knight Skywalker (talk) 05:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.